From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. BLS Limousine Serv. of N.Y., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 30, 2021
199 A.D.3d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Summary

holding a driver acted negligently when he opened the door of his car when it was not safe to do so and struck a bicyclist

Summary of this case from Dooley v. United States

Opinion

14702 Index No. 155102/18 Case No. 2020–04195

11-30-2021

Enrique GARCIA, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. BLS LIMOUSINE SERVICE OF NEW YORK, INC. et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP, Woodbury (Kathryn M. Beer of counsel), for appellants. Ginarte Gallardo Gonzalez Winograd, LLP, New York (Joel Celso of counsel), for respondent.


Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP, Woodbury (Kathryn M. Beer of counsel), for appellants.

Ginarte Gallardo Gonzalez Winograd, LLP, New York (Joel Celso of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moulton, Scarpulla, Higgitt, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lisa A. Headley, J.), entered October 2, 2020, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff established prima facie that defendant driver violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1214 by opening the door of his vehicle when it was not safe to do so and striking plaintiff's bicycle (see Rincon v. Renaud, 186 A.D.3d 1551, 131 N.Y.S.3d 75 [2d Dept. 2020] ; Tavarez v. Castillo Herrasme, 140 A.D.3d 453, 31 N.Y.S.3d 871 [1st Dept. 2016] ). The driver testified that he opened the door on the side of the vehicle adjacent to moving traffic without looking for oncoming vehicles. Furthermore, plaintiff testified that he had no time to take evasive action before the door of the vehicle struck him (see Perez v. Steckler, 157 A.D.3d 445, 66 N.Y.S.3d 137 [1st Dept. 2018] ; see also Sanchez v. Oxcin, 157 A.D.3d 561, 563–564, 69 N.Y.S.3d 623 [1st Dept. 2018] ).

In opposition, defendants failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether defendant driver violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1214 or to offer a nonnegligent explanation for the accident (see Steigelman v. Transervice Lease Corp., 145 A.D.3d 439, 440, 42 N.Y.S.3d 146 [1st Dept. 2016] ; Tavarez, 140 A.D.3d at 453–454, 31 N.Y.S.3d 871 ). Defendants’ assertion that plaintiff was traveling at a high rate of speed before the contact or was too close to their vehicle before the accident is speculative. In any event, comparative negligence is not a defense to a prima facie case but would only affect the amount of damages plaintiff could otherwise recover (see Rodriguez v. City of New York, 31 N.Y.3d 312, 317–318, 76 N.Y.S.3d 898, 101 N.E.3d 366 [2018] ; Silverio v. Ford Motor Co., 183 A.D.3d 470, 471, 121 N.Y.S.3d 869 [1st Dept. 2020] ). The uncertified police accident report prepared by an officer who did not witness the accident is not admissible for the purpose of establishing the cause of the accident (see Kajoshaj v. Greenspan, 88 A.D.2d 538, 450 N.Y.S.2d 311 [1st Dept. 1982] ).


Summaries of

Garcia v. BLS Limousine Serv. of N.Y., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 30, 2021
199 A.D.3d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

holding a driver acted negligently when he opened the door of his car when it was not safe to do so and struck a bicyclist

Summary of this case from Dooley v. United States
Case details for

Garcia v. BLS Limousine Serv. of N.Y., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Enrique GARCIA, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. BLS LIMOUSINE SERVICE OF NEW…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

199 A.D.3d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
199 A.D.3d 612

Citing Cases

Ordonez v. Troiano

It is enough that he opens the door “on the side available to moving traffic” if doing so can interfere with…

McGee v. Bartels

This is precisely where Plaintiff was riding his bicycle. Although Defendants argue that Plaintiff was…