From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galuska v. New York Stock Exchange

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Apr 3, 2000
210 F.3d 374 (7th Cir. 2000)

Summary

affirming summary judgment as there was no evidence presented of physical injury or of extreme and officially sanctioned psychological harm

Summary of this case from Williams v. Halbert

Opinion

99-3522.

April 3, 2000.

Appeal from N.D.Ill.


Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

Galuska v. New York Stock Exchange

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Apr 3, 2000
210 F.3d 374 (7th Cir. 2000)

affirming summary judgment as there was no evidence presented of physical injury or of extreme and officially sanctioned psychological harm

Summary of this case from Williams v. Halbert

rejecting claimant's argument that he had severe impairment because he sought medical treatment for various symptoms

Summary of this case from Scott ex rel. S.T. v. Berryhill

rejecting claimant's argument that he had severe impairment because he sought medical treatment for various symptoms

Summary of this case from Sloniker v. Colvin

rejecting claimant's argument that he had severe impairment because he sought medical treatment for various symptoms

Summary of this case from Turner v. Colvin

rejecting claimant's argument that he had severe impairment because he sought medical treatment for various symptoms

Summary of this case from O'Donnell v. Colvin

rejecting claimant's argument that he had severe impairment because he sought medical treatment for various symptoms

Summary of this case from Summers v. Colvin

acknowledging uncertainty over the scope of § 1631 but saying that “[w]e have not addressed this issue, and need not reach it in this case”

Summary of this case from Fed. Home Loan Bank of Bos. v. Moody's Corp.

noting that a district court had dismissed an action because Mr. Antonelli had "already acquired three strikes"

Summary of this case from Antonelli v. Keffer

noting that both statutes permit transfer to cure want of jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Menzies v. N. Tr. Corp.

describing circuit split concerning whether § 1631 authorizes transfer to cure defects in subject matter jurisdiction only

Summary of this case from Murray v. Cirrus Design Corp.
Case details for

Galuska v. New York Stock Exchange

Case Details

Full title:Galuska v. New York Stock Exchange

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Apr 3, 2000

Citations

210 F.3d 374 (7th Cir. 2000)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Shell Chemical Company

The Jason court also relied on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Galuska v. New York Stock…

Williams v. Halbert

However, he fails to give an evidentiary or factual basis for fearing physical assault by an SIS or other BOP…