From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 28, 2002
806 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 1D01-2841

Opinion filed January 28, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County. James Roy Bean, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The trial court denied as successive the appellant's motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the present motion was filed and ruled on while an appeal of one of the appellant's previous Rule 3.800(a) motions, raising the same issue, was pending in this Court, the trial court did not have jurisdiction over the instant motion. See Bates v. State, 704 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The trial court therefore should have dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction, rather than having denied the motion. See Williams v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D1307 (Fla. 1st DCA May 24, 2001). Accordingly, we vacate the order denying the motion and remand for the trial court to dismiss the motion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

ALLEN, C.J., and BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Gaines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 28, 2002
806 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Gaines v. State

Case Details

Full title:DON S. GAINES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 28, 2002

Citations

806 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Lovett v. State

It is true that rule 3.800(a) provides that a party may not file a motion under that subdivision during the…

Latulip v. State

Rule 3.800(a) provides that a party may not file a motion under that subdivision during the pendency of a…