Summary
concluding that Cone Brothers is still good law and affirming the trial court's orders vacating in part the final judgment of foreclosure
Summary of this case from Bank of America, N.A. v. Kipps Colony II Condominium Ass'nOpinion
Nos. 5D12–2730 5D12–3346.
2013-05-21
FUTRELL CUSTOM POOLS, INC., Appellant, v. SUNSHINE CUSTOM BUILDERS, INC., et al., Appellees.
Non–Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, John M. Harris, Judge. J. Preston Silvernail, Judge. Christopher M. Sprysenski and Dominick J. Salfi, of Salfi & Sprysenski, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. Jeffry R. Jontz and Eric B. Jontz, of Swann, Hadley, Stump, Dietrich & Spears, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee Hancock Bank.
Non–Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, John M. Harris, Judge. J. Preston Silvernail, Judge.
Christopher M. Sprysenski and Dominick J. Salfi, of Salfi & Sprysenski, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. Jeffry R. Jontz and Eric B. Jontz, of Swann, Hadley, Stump, Dietrich & Spears, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee Hancock Bank.
No Appearance for Appellee, Sunshine Custom Builders, Inc.
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated mortgage foreclosure cases, Futrell Custom Pools, Inc. appeals non-final orders that vacated in part final judgments of foreclosure pursuant to Cone Brothers Construction Co. v. Moore, 193 So. 288 (Fla.1940). Concluding that Cone Brothers is still good law, we reject Futrell's arguments. See Citimortgage, Inc. v. Henry, 24 So.3d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).
AFFIRMED.