From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fultcher v. Hatcher

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 19, 2003
63 F. App'x 386 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion


63 Fed.Appx. 386 (9th Cir. 2003) Alfred Ramaz FULTCHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sherman HATCHER, Respondent-Appellee. No. 02-16409. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 19, 2003

Submitted May 12, 2003.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Larry R.

Page 387.

Hicks, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-01-00042-LRH.

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Nevada state prisoner Alfred Ramaz Fultcher appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as time-barred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(a). Reviewing de novo, Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999), we affirm.

Fultcher's federal petition was filed more than a year after his state court conviction became final, and thus it is time-barred unless some form of tolling applies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Fultcher contends that he is actually innocent and that actual innocence is an exception to the one-year statute of limitations. We have not decided whether actual innocence is an exception in such circumstances. See Majoy v. Roe, 296 F.3d 770, 776-77 (9th Cir.2002) (declining to decide the issue). We need not reach the issue in this case. Even if the exception applied, Fultcher has not established that he is actually innocent, because he has proffered no new evidence indicating that the knife he used was, in fact, not inherently dangerous. See Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614, 623, 118 S.Ct. 1604, 140 L.Ed.2d 828 (1998) (stating that to establish actual innocence, a prisoner must show that "in light of all the evidence, it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have convicted him") (internal quotation marks omitted).

Thus, the district court properly dismissed Fultcher's petition.

We deny Fultcher's motion to broaden the certificate of appealability, as well as all other pending motions.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Fultcher v. Hatcher

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 19, 2003
63 F. App'x 386 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Fultcher v. Hatcher

Case Details

Full title:Alfred Ramaz FULTCHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sherman HATCHER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 19, 2003

Citations

63 F. App'x 386 (9th Cir. 2003)

Citing Cases

Lee v. Lampert

In all of these cases, our court inquired as to actual innocence on the assumption that such an exception…