From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fudge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 6, 2022
336 So. 3d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2466

04-06-2022

Dominique J. FUDGE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Dominique J. Fudge, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Dominique J. Fudge, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. See Blanco v. Wainwright , 507 So. 2d 1377, 1384 (Fla. 1987) (holding that appellate counsel may not be deemed ineffective for failing to raise issue of ineffectiveness of trial counsel on direct appeal); see also Steiger v. State , 328 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 2021) (holding that an unpreserved claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel may not be raised or result in reversal on direct appeal).

Roberts, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fudge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 6, 2022
336 So. 3d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Fudge v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dominique J. FUDGE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Apr 6, 2022

Citations

336 So. 3d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)