From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fryman v. Traquina

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 14, 2009
No. CIV S-07-2636 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2636 JAM DAD P.

January 14, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On October 24, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 24, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's April 16, 2008 motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 14) is denied without prejudice; and

3. Defendants' June 3, 2008 cross-motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 18) is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Fryman v. Traquina

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 14, 2009
No. CIV S-07-2636 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Fryman v. Traquina

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN FRYMAN, Plaintiff, v. A. TRAQUINA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2636 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

Soares v. Guajardo

Thomas v. Porter, 611 F.3d 1144, 1149-1150 (9th Cir. 2010) (finding pro se inmates exempt strict compliance…

O'Connor v. Carnahan

Regardless, the prison records' authenticity cannot reasonably be argued. See, e.g., Fryman v. Traquina, No.…