From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedman v. New York

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 441 (1967)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT.

No. 7.

Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Ira H. Holley and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Frank S. Hogan for respondent.


The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.


Summaries of

Friedman v. New York

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 441 (1967)
Case details for

Friedman v. New York

Case Details

Full title:FRIEDMAN v . NEW YORK

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 12, 1967

Citations

388 U.S. 441 (1967)
87 S. Ct. 2091

Citing Cases

United States v. Groner

U.S. 89, 88 S.Ct. 253, 19 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1969); Central Magazine Sales. Ltd. v. United States, 389 U.S. 50, 88…

Wayne Co. Prosecutor v. Doerfler

386 U.S. 767, 769, ( 87 S Ct 1414, 18 L Ed 2d 515, 517), that an Arkansas statute which did not reflect a…