From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freedman v. First Nat. Bk., Hollywood

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 23, 1971
255 So. 2d 709 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

No. P-264.

December 23, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval County; Martin Sack, Judge.

Norman P. Freedman, in pro. per.

Sears, Dunlap Sears, Jacksonville, for appellee.


This case is before the court on appellee's motion to quash or dismiss the appeal on the ground that it is frivolous and taken only for the purpose of delay.

The motion of appellee is denied, oral argument dispensed with, and the appeal is considered on its merits. Our review of the brief filed by appellant convinces us that the only substantial points presented for decision raise issues of law which have heretofore been resolved against appellant by this court's decision on the question certified to it in this case by the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit. The remaining points urged by appellant are without substantial merit and do not warrant reversal of the challenged judgment.

First National Bank of Hollywood v. Freedman, (Fla.App. 1971) 244 So.2d 183.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C.J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Freedman v. First Nat. Bk., Hollywood

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 23, 1971
255 So. 2d 709 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Freedman v. First Nat. Bk., Hollywood

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN P. FREEDMAN, APPELLANT, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOLLYWOOD…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 23, 1971

Citations

255 So. 2d 709 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Citing Cases

Freedman v. First Nat. Bk., Hollywood

PER CURIAM. The motion to quash or dismiss this appeal is denied and the judgment affirmed on the authority…