From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francois v. Washmonbo, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Jul 8, 2008
CASE NO. 05-23368-CIV-MOORE/SIMONTON (S.D. Fla. Jul. 8, 2008)

Summary

appointing special process server to serve writ of garnishment

Summary of this case from Sumner v. Garner

Opinion

CASE NO. 05-23368-CIV-MOORE/SIMONTON.

July 8, 2008


ORDER


Presently pending before the Court is the Application for Issuance of Writ of Garnishment and Appointment of Special Process Server (DE # 96), filed by Defendant on June 2, 2008. This motion was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge to take all necessary and appropriate action (DE # 97). Although writs of garnishment may be issued on an ex parte basis, the undersigned notes that this Application was served via CM/ECF on counsel for Plaintiff; the deadline for filing a response in opposition was June 19, 2008, and no opposition was filed. Based upon a review of the record as a whole, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Application be GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

This post-judgment motion arises from a lawsuit in which Plaintiff Micheline Francois and others sued their employer alleging that they were subjected to a sexually hostile work environment, in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et. seq. (DE # 6).

On December 12, 2007, following a jury verdict in Defendant's favor, the Court issued a judgment awarding Defendant $5,307.31 in fees and costs as the prevailing party under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, to be assessed jointly and severally among the plaintiffs (DE # 94). Based on its assertion that Ms. Francois has no personal property with which to pay the judgment, Defendant has requested that this Court enter a continuing writ of garnishment against her wages from her employer, Fisher Island Club, Inc., for the value of the $5,307.31 cost judgment as well as interest accruing at a rate of 3.16% per year from the date the judgment was issued.

The total consists of $521.00 for service of summons and subpoenas; $3,031.10 for transcripts; $450.00 for witness fees; $600.74 for blowing up exhibits; and $704.47 for three sets of trial exhibits (DE # 94).

"Florida courts have interpreted the garnishment provisions to include garnishment of post-judgment interest." Communications Ctr. v. Komatsu, No. 6:05-cv-1254-Orl-31UAM, 2008 WL 114920, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 8, 2008) (citing First Union Nat'l Bank of Fla. v. Knyal, 874 So. 2d 716, 717 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)).

II. ANALYSIS

Under Florida law, "[e]very person or entity who . . . has recovered judgment in any court against any person or entity has a right to a writ of garnishment." Fla. Stat. § 77.01. Thus, having obtained a final judgment against Ms. Francois, Defendant is entitled to a writ of garnishment and it is not necessary to hold a hearing or provide notice prior to issuing the writ. See United Presidential Life Ins. Co. v. King, 361 So. 2d 710, 712-13 (Fla. 1978); First Union Nat'l Bank of Fla. v. Knyal, 874 So. 2d 716, 717 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Motions for writs of garnishment to satisfy a final judgment "must accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located, but a federal statute governs to the extent it applies." Fed.R.Civ.P. 69; accord Communications Ctr., Inc. v. Komatsu, No. 6:05-cv-1254-Orl-31UAM, 2008 WL 114920, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 8, 2008). The requirements for issuing a writ of continuing garnishment under Florida law are governed by statute. See Fla. Stat. § 77.01, et seq.; Komatsu, supra.

A. Continuing Writ of Garnishment Against Salary or Wages

Pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 77.0305,

if salary or wages are to be garnished to satisfy a judgment, the court shall issue a continuing writ of garnishment to the judgment debtor's employer which provides for the periodic payment of a portion of the salary or wages of the judgment as the salary or wages become due until the judgment is satisfied or until otherwise provided by court order.

The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure include a form for an ordinary Writ of Garnishment and a separate form for a Continuing Writ of Garnishment Against Salary or Wages. Fla. R. Civ. P. Form 1.907(a)-(b). Defendant attached a proposed writ that incorporates elements of both the Writ of Garnishment Form and the Continuing Writ of Garnishment Form.

Specifically, consistent with the Continuing Writ of Garnishment Form found in the Florida Rules, Defendant's proposed writ advises the garnishee, Fisher Island Club, of its obligation to answer the writ within 20 days; asks Fisher Island Club to specify Ms. Francois' payment period (i.e., weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, etc.) and the amount of her salary; directs the garnishee to withhold portions of Ms. Francois' salary; and sets forth the method of calculating the appropriate amount to withhold in order to satisfy the judgment and any administrative costs. In addition to these items, however, Defendant's proposed writ also seeks the information typically requested in a regular writ of garnishment: It asks Fisher Island Club to identify the date of her termination if she no longer works there; whether Fisher Island Club is in possession of any of Ms. Francois' personal property; and, whether Fisher Island Club is aware of any other person indebted to Ms. Francois or may possess any of her personal property (DE # 96, Exh. 1). The undersigned finds that it is appropriate to issue the writ to garnish wages and to recover other property.

B. Service of Process

Defendant has requested that this Court specially appoint Countrywide Process Server, 12250 SW 132 Ct., Miami, Florida, to serve the writ in this case. Federal law governs who may serve a writ of garnishment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 69(a)(1) ("The procedure . . . in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment . . . must accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located but a federal statute governs to the extent it applies."). The Federal Rules have the "force and effect" of a federal statute, see Alejandre v. Republic of Cuba, 42 F. Supp. 2d 1317, 1341 (S.D. Fla. 1999), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 183 F.3d 1277 (11th Cir. 1999); and, the Federal Rules, in turn, permit the appointment of a special process server to deliver a writ of garnishment like the one at issue here. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.1 ("Process — other than a summons under Rule 4 or a subpoena under Rule 45 — must be served by a United States marshal or deputy marshal or by a person specially appointed for that purpose.") Therefore, this Court authorizes any employee or agent of Countrywide Process Server, 12250 SW 132 Ct., Miami, Florida, who is otherwise legally permitted to effectuate service of process under applicable law, to serve the writ of garnishment on the garnishee, Fisher Island Club. Cf. Burroughs Corp. v. Carsan Leasing Co., 99 F.R.D. 528, 531 (D.N.J. 1983) ("[S]pecial appointments are perfunctorily made by the court").

To the extent that Florida law, and not federal law, governs who may serve a writ of garnishment, the undersigned notes that Florida law also permits the appointment of a special process server in circumstances like those presented in the case at bar. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.070 ("[T]he court may appoint any competent person not interested in the action to serve the process."); Sims v. Meredith, 967 So. 2d 393, 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Space Coast Credit Union v. The First, F.A., 467 So. 2d 737, 739 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

C. Required Notices

The undersigned notes that Defendant's Application does not address the issue of the notice that is required to be served upon Ms. Francois. Within the later of five business days after the continuing writ of garnishment is issued or three business days after the writ is served on the garnishee, Defendant must deliver to Ms. Francois' last known address: a copy of the writ, the motion for the writ and the statutory notice contained in Fla. Stat. § 77.041(2).

In addition, pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 77.055, Defendant must file a certificate of service certifying that, "[w]ithin 5 days after service of the garnishee's answer," or "after the time for the garnishee's answer has expired," Defendant has delivered to Ms. Francois' last known address "a copy of the garnishee's answer, and a notice advising [her] that . . . she must move to dissolve the writ of garnishment within 20 days after the date indicated on the certificate of service in the notice if any allegation in the . . . motion for writ of garnishment is untrue."

D. Required Fees

Finally, Florida law and the Local Rules require Defendant to post a statutorily-mandated fee prior to the issuance of a writ of garnishment. Under Florida law, "[b]efore issuance of any writ of garnishment, the party applying for it shall deposit $100 in the registry of the court." Fla Stat. § 77.28. The Local Rules echo this requirement. S.D. Fla. L.R. 67.1.H ("A party applying for the issuance of a writ of garnishment shall deposit the amount prescribed by applicable Florida law in the non-interest bearing registry of the Court."). Based upon a review of the record, it does not appear that Defendant has yet deposited the required fee. Thus, prior to the issuance of the writ of garnishment, Defendant must file a notice with the Court confirming his compliance with Fla. Stat. § 77.28 and S.D. Fla. L.R. 67.1. It is, accordingly,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Application for Issuance of Writ of Garnishment and Appointment of Special Process Server (DE # 96) is GRANTED as follows:

1. Defendant shall file a Notice with this Court certifying that it has complied with any applicable state and federal laws and rules concerning the deposit of fees prior to the issuance of a writ of garnishment, including Fla. Stat. § 77.28 and S.D. Fla. L.R. 67.1.

2. Upon Defendant's deposit of the required fees into the registry of the Court and the filing of Defendant's Notice of Compliance, the Clerk of the Court shall issue the Continuing Writ of Garnishment Against Salary or Wages as it appears in the attachment hereto.

3. Countrywide Process Server is specially appointed to serve the Continuing Writ of Garnishment upon the garnishee, Fisher Island Club, consistent with all applicable rules and laws concerning the service of a writ of garnishment upon a garnishee.

4. Within five business days after the writ is issued or within three business days after the writ is served on the garnishee, whichever is later, Plaintiff shall serve Ms. Francois, at her last known address, a copy of: (i) the continuing writ of garnishment, (ii) the motion for the writ (DE # 96), and (iii) the statutory notice contained in Fla. Stat. § 77.041(2); and

5. Within five days of service of the garnishee's answer on Defendant or after the time for the garnishee's answer has expired, Defendant shall file a certificate of service certifying that Defendant served, by mail at Ms. Francois' last known address, a copy of: (i) the garnishee's answer, and (ii) a notice advising Ms. Francois that she must move to dissolve the writ within twenty days after the date indicated on the certificate of service if any allegation in the Defendant's Application for Issuance of Writ of Garnishment is untrue.

DONE AND ORDERED.

CONTINUING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT AGAINST SALARY OR WAGES

THE STATE OF FLORIDA

To the United States Marshal or deputy marshal or specially appointed process server:

YOU ARE COMMANDED to summon the garnishee, Fisher Island Club, Inc., by serving Corpco as its Registered Agent whose address is 2699 S. Bayshore Drive, 7th Floor, Miami, Florida 33133. The garnishee is required to serve an answer to this writ on Leslie W. Langbein, Esq., Garnishor's attorney, whose address is 8181 NW 154th Street, Suite 105, Miami Lakes, Florida 33016 within 20 days after service of this writ, exclusive of the day of service, and to file the original with the Clerk of the Court (in person or via CM/ECF) either before service on the attorney or immediately thereafter. The answer shall state whether the garnishee is the employer of the judgment debtor, Micheline Francois, and whether the garnishee is indebted to the judgment debtor by reason of salary or wages. The garnishee's answer shall specify the periods of payment (for example, weekly, biweekly, or monthly) and amount of salary or wages and be based on the judgment debtor's earnings for the pay period during which this writ is served on the garnishee; as well as when Micheline Francois' services were terminated if she is not employed at the time of service of this Writ; whether the garnishee was indebted to Micheline Francois at the time of service of this Writ or at the time of its answer, or during the intervening time, and in what sum or sums; whether garnishee has or not in its possession or under its control tangible or intangible personal property of Micheline Francois at the time of service of this Writ, or when it makes its answer or at any time between such times; and whether the garnishee is aware of any other person indebted to Micheline Francois or who may have any of the property of Micheline Francois in his or her possession or control.

During each pay period, a portion of the judgment debtor's salary or wages as it becomes due shall be held and not disposed of or transferred until further order of this Court. The amount of salary or wages to be withheld for each pay period shall be made in accordance with the following paragraph. This writ shall continue until the judgment is paid in full or until otherwise provided by court order.

Federal law ( 15 U.S.C. § 1671- 1673) limits the amount to be withheld from salary or wages to no more than 25% of any individual judgment debtor's disposable earnings (the part of earnings remaining after the deduction of any amounts required by law to be deducted) for any pay period or to no more than the amount by which the individual's disposable earnings for the pay period exceed 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage, whichever is less.

For administrative costs, the garnishee may collect $5.00 against the salary or wages of the judgment debtor for the first deduction and $2.00 for each deduction thereafter.

The total amount of the final judgment outstanding as set out in the Application for Issuance of Writ of Garnishment is $5,307.31 with interest accruing at the rate of 3.16% per year ($0.46 per day) from date of entry of the judgment on December 12, 2007.

FAILURE TO FILE AN ANSWER WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED MAY RESULT IN THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AGAINST THE GARNISHEE FOR THE ABOVE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $5,307.31 PLUS INTEREST OF 3.16% PER YEAR.

ORDERED.


Summaries of

Francois v. Washmonbo, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Jul 8, 2008
CASE NO. 05-23368-CIV-MOORE/SIMONTON (S.D. Fla. Jul. 8, 2008)

appointing special process server to serve writ of garnishment

Summary of this case from Sumner v. Garner
Case details for

Francois v. Washmonbo, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHELINE FRANCOIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WASHMONBO, INC., d/b/a FRONT…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida

Date published: Jul 8, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 05-23368-CIV-MOORE/SIMONTON (S.D. Fla. Jul. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

Phx. NPL, LLC v. Capital Hotel, Inc.

A writ of garnishment is a form of "process." See, e.g., 28 U.S.C.§ 3004(a) ("a complaint, notice, writ, or…

Sumner v. Garner

Accordingly, the request to appoint a special process server will be granted. Francois v. Washmonbo, Inc.,…