From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 10, 1992
608 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-835.

November 10, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Steve Levine, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Consuelo Maingot and Francine Thomas, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ


Because the appellant's sole point on the merits presents only harmless error, State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986), the convictions under review are affirmed. The cause is remanded for resentencing within the appropriate cell without including legal constraint points under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 d. 6. The fact that the defendant was on felony bond when the offenses were committed does not permit such an assessment. Brown v. State, 569 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 1990); Mosely v. State, 543 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Mize v. State, 495 So.2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.


Summaries of

Fox v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 10, 1992
608 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Fox v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES NATHAN FOX, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 10, 1992

Citations

608 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Annunziata v. State

Prior to the 1994 amendments to the sentencing guidelines, legal status points were not assessed against…