In Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 204 [65 Cal.Rptr.2d 127], Division Two of our Court held that an insurer's duty to defend any "suit" includes a duty to defend an administrative "claim."
Summary of this case from Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Superior Court1997
Reprinted without change in the Review Granted Opinions Pamphlet to permit tracking pending review and disposition by the Supreme Court.
In Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 204 [65 Cal.Rptr.2d 127], Division Two of our Court held that an insurer's duty to defend any "suit" includes a duty to defend an administrative "claim."
Summary of this case from Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Superior CourtIn Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 204, Division Two of our Court held that an insurer's duty to defend any "suit" includes a duty to defend an administrative "claim."
Summary of this case from Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Sup. CourtFull title:Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
SPENCER, P.J. In Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 204, Division Two…
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Superior CourtVOGEL (Miriam A.), J. In Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 204…