From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forster v. Durham

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 13, 1990
566 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 1990)

Opinion

No. 75529.

September 13, 1990.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fourth District — Case No. 88-3012 (Palm Beach County).

Alberto A. Macia and Allen P. Reed of Shea Gould, Miami, for petitioner.

Michael A. Hanzman and Sally R. Doerner of Floyd, Pearson, Richman, Greer, Weil, Zack Brumbaugh, P.A., Miami, for respondents.


We accepted review of Durham v. Palm Court, Inc., 558 So.2d 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), based on express and direct conflict with First Florida Bank, N.A. v. Max Mitchell Co., 541 So.2d 155 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), quashed, 558 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1990), and Gordon v. Etue, Wardlaw Co., 511 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), disapproved, First Florida Bank, 558 So.2d at 16. We now find that the basis of conflict jurisdiction has been eliminated by our opinion in First Florida Bank. Moreover, we find the result reached by the district court below to be consistent with the analysis in First Florida Bank. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for lack of conflict jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT.


Summaries of

Forster v. Durham

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 13, 1990
566 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 1990)
Case details for

Forster v. Durham

Case Details

Full title:PANNELL KERR FORSTER, PETITIONER, v. VAUGHN DURHAM, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 13, 1990

Citations

566 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 1990)

Citing Cases

Ocean Ritz of Daytona Condominium v. GGV Associates, Ltd.

Angel, Cohen Rogovin v. Oberon Investment, N.V., 512 So.2d 192 (Fla. 1987).Durham v. Palm Court, Inc., 558…