From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 19, 1983
431 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-726.

May 19, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Carven D. Angel, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Curley R. Doltie, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The following dialogue took place at trial:

Question: (by State Attorney): Did the Defendant respond to your questions when you read the exhibit [ Miranda rights card].

Answer (by Officer Hardway): He stated he had nothing to say.

Defense counsel immediately moved for mistrial. The question and response are improper and require reversal. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41 (Fla. 1975); Jones v. State, 200 So.2d 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). The case is remanded for a new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 19, 1983
431 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Ford v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD EDWARD FORD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 19, 1983

Citations

431 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Rowell v. State

See Snowden v. State, 449 So.2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). The appellant relies upon Bennett v. State, 316…

Crawford v. State

In Rowell v. State, 450 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), the Fifth District Court analyzed State v. Murray,…