From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 5, 1995
657 So. 2d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-1015.

July 5, 1995.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court, Okeechobee County, William L. Hendry, J.

Arthur W. Foley, Belle Glade, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant seeks review of an order denying his rule 3.800(a) motion without an evidentiary hearing and without attachment of those parts of the record demonstrating that appellant is entitled to no relief. The state has filed a response as ordered by this court and attached those parts of the record demonstrating that appellant is not entitled to relief. However, this court held in Cherry v. State, 638 So.2d 111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994):

The state attempted to bridge the gap by filing copies of the appropriate documents. However, the state cannot cure the trial court's failure to comply with the requirement of rule 9.140(g).
Id. at 112 (citations omitted).

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order denying appellant's 3.800(a) motion and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to attach to its order denying appellant's 3.800(a) motion those parts of the record demonstrating that he is entitled to no relief.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Foley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 5, 1995
657 So. 2d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Foley v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR W. FOLEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 5, 1995

Citations

657 So. 2d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Worthington v. State

The state's attempt to provide such documentation to this court by supplemental record does not cure the…

Saunders v. State

Further, the state's attempt to provide such documentation to this court by a supplemental record does not…