From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. Logan

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Mar 3, 2022
Civil Action 9:18cv161 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 9:18cv161

03-03-2022

MICHAEL W. FLOYD v. JOHNATHON P. LOGAN, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Thad Heartfield, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Michael W. Floyd, an inmate at the Polunsky Unit, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No. objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is

ORDERED that the defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendations.


Summaries of

Floyd v. Logan

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Mar 3, 2022
Civil Action 9:18cv161 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Floyd v. Logan

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL W. FLOYD v. JOHNATHON P. LOGAN, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division

Date published: Mar 3, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 9:18cv161 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2022)

Citing Cases

Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery Sols.

Welsh's failure to present any evidence as to this consideration, e.g., Defendant Gonzales's actual…