From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Florek v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Oct 21, 2009
1:08-CV-0919 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2009)

Opinion

1:08-CV-0919.

October 21, 2009

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: PETER M. MARGOLIUS, ESQ., MARGOLIUS LAW OFFICE, Catskill, New York.

FOR THE DEFENDANT: JOHN M. KELLY, ESQ., Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, HON. ANDREW T. BAXTER, Acting United States Attorney, Northern District of New York, Syracuse, New York, MARY ANN SLOAN, ESQ., Acting Chief Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Office of the General Counsel, Region II, New York, New York.


ORDER


The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles, duly filed on the 5th day of October 2009. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.

2. The Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, the Commissioner's determination of no disability is affirmed, and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed in all respects.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Florek v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Oct 21, 2009
1:08-CV-0919 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Florek v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY FLOREK, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Oct 21, 2009

Citations

1:08-CV-0919 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2009)

Citing Cases

Mark Robert L. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Consequently, there is no requirement that an ALJ accept every limitation in an opinion where portions of…

Yargeau v. Berryhill

In this case, Dr. Zittel's opinion was rendered almost a year after the ALJ had issued his decision, and…