From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fla. Indus. Power United Statesers Grp. v. Graham

Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 8, 2013
126 So. 3d 1056 (Fla. 2013)

Opinion

No. SC12–1440.

2013-10-8

FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL POWER USERS GROUP, Appellant(s). v. Art GRAHAM, Etc., et al., Appellee(s).


We hereby dismiss the case for lack of standing, because the Appellant did not demonstrate that it is adversely affected by the Appellee's decision and does not cite to competent, substantial evidence in the record supporting this position. See Martin Cnty. Conservation Alliance v. Martin Cnty., 73 So.3d 856, 862–64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (explaining that to have standing to appeal an organization must demonstrate that it is adversely affected by the decision and acknowledging that mere speculation regarding future adverse impacts is insufficient). POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
LEWIS, J., concurs in result.

QUINCE, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Fla. Indus. Power United Statesers Grp. v. Graham

Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 8, 2013
126 So. 3d 1056 (Fla. 2013)
Case details for

Fla. Indus. Power United Statesers Grp. v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL POWER USERS GROUP, Appellant(s). v. Art GRAHAM, Etc.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Oct 8, 2013

Citations

126 So. 3d 1056 (Fla. 2013)

Citing Cases

T.G. United, Inc. v. AADD Props.

See Fla. Indus. Power Users Grp. v. Graham, 126 So.3d 1056 (Fla. 2013). The parties inform us that the U.S.…

Donovan v. City of Destin

These consolidated appeals are dismissed for lack of standing given Appellants' failure to demonstrate…