From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fla. Dep't of Health v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 12, 2022
348 So. 3d 697 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-334.

10-12-2022

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and Dr. Joseph Ladapo, in his official capacity as State Surgeon General and State Health Officer of the Florida Department of Health, Petitioners, v. Carlos Guillermo SMITH and Florida Center for Government Accountability, Inc., Respondents, andThe Associated Press, The First Amendment Foundation, Gannett Co., Inc., The McClatchy Company, LLC d/b/a The Miami Herald, The New York Times Company, Scripps Media, Inc., Sun-Sentinel Company, LLC, Times Publishing Co. and WP Company, LLC, Intervenor Respondents.


Per Curiam .

The Florida Department of Health and State Surgeon General seek certiorari review of an order denying their motion for a protective order as to the deposition of a corporate representative in a public records lawsuit. Because the petition does not demonstrate that the order would result in irreparable harm to the petitioners, the petition is DISMISSED. See Univ. of Fla. Bd. of Trs. v. Carmody, 331 So.3d 236, 237 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (conditioning certiorari jurisdiction upon a showing of irreparable harm which cannot be corrected on direct appeal).

Ray, Osterhaus, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fla. Dep't of Health v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 12, 2022
348 So. 3d 697 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Fla. Dep't of Health v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and Dr. Joseph Ladapo, in his official…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Oct 12, 2022

Citations

348 So. 3d 697 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)