From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitts v. Poe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 26, 1997
699 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-415

Opinion Filed September 26, 1997

Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Edward M. Jackson, Judge.

Walter T. Rose, Jr., of Rose and Weller, Cocoa Beach, for Appellants.

Michael K. Poe, Melbourne, for Appellee.


Jere Fitts, the natural father and Jane Fitts, his wife, the adoptive mother, appeal an order awarding visitation rights to Anna Poe, the natural maternal grandmother. Poe's daughter, the natural mother, died on August 1, 1995. We reverse.

In Beagle v. Beagle, 678 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1996), the supreme court found paragraph (1)(e) of section 752.01, Florida Statutes (1995), to impermissibly infringe on the right to parent a child free from governmental intervention, a right protected by Article I, Section 23 of the Florida Constitution. Subparagraph (1)(e) of the statute permitted visitation by a grandparent when it was in the best interest of the child, the minor lived with both of his natural parents, and at least one of those parents had prohibited a relationship between that minor child and the grandparent. The subparagraph in issue in this case is section 752.01(1)(a), which permits visitation by a grandparent when it is in the best interest of the child and one or both of the child's parents are deceased. We find paragraph (1)(a) of the statute is likewise unconstitutional because we are unable to discern any difference between the fundamental rights of privacy of a natural parent in an intact family and the fundamental rights of privacy of a widowed parent. Beagle, see Ward v. Dibble, 683 So.2d 666, n.2, (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Accordingly, the trial court's order awarding visitation to Poe is reversed.

We note the court, in addressing the question of whether the state may impose grandparental visitation upon an intact family, suggested that the statute may have passed constitutional muster if, rather than the best interests standard, the statute had permitted court imposed visitation upon a finding of harm to the child if such visitation was withheld.

While the father in the instant case has remarried and his wife has adopted the children in question, the grandparental rights in this case emanated from the father's widowhood. Cf. §§ 752.01 752.07, Fla. Stat. (1995).

REVERSED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., and THOMPSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Fitts v. Poe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 26, 1997
699 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Fitts v. Poe

Case Details

Full title:JERE FITTS AND JANE FITTS, APPELLANTS, v. ANNA POE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 26, 1997

Citations

699 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Von Eiff v. Azicri

Since Von Eiff was decided, the Fourth and Fifth Districts have found subsection (1)(a) to be an…

Russo v. Persico

The statute requires the trial court to award reasonable visitation rights merely upon a showing of "best…