From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

First National Bank v. Exchange National Bank

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 29, 1919
123 N.E. 868 (N.Y. 1919)

Opinion

Argued April 15, 1919

Decided April 29, 1919

Herman A. Carmer and George E. Zartman for appellants.

W. Smith O'Brien for respondent.


Several of the questions sought to be raised by the appellants are conclusively settled by the unanimous affirmance by the Appellate Division of the judgment of the Special Term. A careful consideration of the other questions argued fails to disclose any substantial error which would justify the reversal of the judgment. There is, however, one error in the form of the judgment which necessitates a modification of it.

It appears that from October 1st, 1908, to April 1st, 1915, the First National Bank of Waterloo has declared on the stock pledged to it fourteen dividends of 2½% each, making a total of $4,427.50, and in the thirteenth subdivision of the judgment it is provided that the purchaser or purchasers of such stock upon the sale directed to be made shall be entitled to all the dividends which have been declared upon said stocks or any of them and which remain unpaid, together with any dividends which may be declared and remain unpaid prior to such sale. This is contrary to the general rule. It is well settled that under circumstances similar to those here established, it is the right and duty of the pledgee of stock to collect the dividends declared thereon and apply them towards reduction of the indebtedness for which the stock is held as security. This rule was reiterated recently by this court. (See Brightson v. Claflin, 225 N.Y. 469, and authorities there cited.) The dividends declared upon the stock of the plaintiff remain in its possession and are not subject of a sale, but should be applied, prior to the sale, in reduction of the indebtedness found due. If at the time of the sale a dividend has been declared on the stock which has not become payable, then as to that dividend the purchaser of the stock would take it.

The judgment should, therefore, be modified by striking out the thirteenth subdivision and inserting in place thereof the following: That the plaintiff, prior to the sale of the stocks ordered to be sold, apply on the amount found due it all dividends which have been declared on said stocks or any of them and which are due and remain unpaid at the date of sale, together with the interest on such dividends from the entry of judgment on the remittitur of this court to said sale, and the purchaser of the certificates of stock issued by the First National Bank of Waterloo is required to surrender said certificates to the plaintiff and have issued in the place thereof certificates representing one hundred and twenty-six and one-half shares of the present capital stock of the plaintiff; and the judgment, as thus modified, should be affirmed, with costs.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

First National Bank v. Exchange National Bank

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 29, 1919
123 N.E. 868 (N.Y. 1919)
Case details for

First National Bank v. Exchange National Bank

Case Details

Full title:THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WATERLOO, Respondent, v . THE EXCHANGE NATIONAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 29, 1919

Citations

123 N.E. 868 (N.Y. 1919)
123 N.E. 868

Citing Cases

Matter of Mackenzie

Upon such reargument this court renders this decision. The objectant, Henry M. Potter, has cited authority…

Matter of Brewer

There was no waiver of this right and the status of general creditors was not changed. The rights of a…