From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

F.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 12, 2011
50 So. 3d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 3D10-301.

January 12, 2011.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Johnson, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, SUAREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


The defendant appeals from a withhold of adjudication and order of probation. We affirm.

The defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of dismissal and convicting him of attempted robbery where the evidence showed he voluntarily abandoned his attempt to commit the robbery. We find the defendant's arguments to be unpersuasive. The defendant did not abandon the robbery. Instead, according to the defendant's own testimony, either the victim started to walk away (under one version of the facts); or, he was hit by another person (under another version of the facts). In either case, the defendant did not voluntarily abandon the robbery. See Carroll v. State, 680 So.2d 1065, 1066 (Fla. 3d DCA 19%) (noting that the law distinguishes between a voluntary abandonment and an involuntary abandonment, and an involuntary abandonment is not a defense).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

F.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 12, 2011
50 So. 3d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

F.C. v. State

Case Details

Full title:F.C., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 12, 2011

Citations

50 So. 3d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)