From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faubus v. Saul

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Feb 5, 2020
No. 19-2518 (8th Cir. Feb. 5, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-2518

02-05-2020

Yoonjong Faubus Plaintiff - Appellant v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Defendant - Appellee


Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock [Unpublished] Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Yoonjong Faubus appeals a district court order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. We agree with the district court that Faubus received a full and fair administrative hearing. See Passmore v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 658, 663-64 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing de novo challenge to procedures of social security disability hearing). The judgment is affirmed.

The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.


Summaries of

Faubus v. Saul

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Feb 5, 2020
No. 19-2518 (8th Cir. Feb. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Faubus v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:Yoonjong Faubus Plaintiff - Appellant v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Feb 5, 2020

Citations

No. 19-2518 (8th Cir. Feb. 5, 2020)