From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FATE v. BRITT

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Nov 5, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5684, SECTION: "R"(5) (E.D. La. Nov. 5, 2007)

Summary

In Britt, Plaintiff brought an action in the Eastern District of Louisiana, using that court's prisoner complaint form captioned for actions under § 1983, against the owner, manager, and "second in charge" of a hotel at which Plaintiff and his wife were working.

Summary of this case from Fate v. New York

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5684, SECTION: "R"(5).

November 5, 2007


ORDER


The Court, having reviewed de novo the complaint, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the plaintiff's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion herein.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants, "Britt", "Larry", and Tony DeAngelo, who are identified as the owner, hotel manager and second-in-charge, respectively, of the St. Louis Hotel and the St. Ann Marie Antoinette Hotel in New Orleans, Louisiana, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).


Summaries of

FATE v. BRITT

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Nov 5, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5684, SECTION: "R"(5) (E.D. La. Nov. 5, 2007)

In Britt, Plaintiff brought an action in the Eastern District of Louisiana, using that court's prisoner complaint form captioned for actions under § 1983, against the owner, manager, and "second in charge" of a hotel at which Plaintiff and his wife were working.

Summary of this case from Fate v. New York
Case details for

FATE v. BRITT

Case Details

Full title:FOREST LEE FATE v. BRITT, OWNER OF HOTEL, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: Nov 5, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5684, SECTION: "R"(5) (E.D. La. Nov. 5, 2007)

Citing Cases

Fate v. New York

The Court therefore will not count this dismissal as a strike under § 1915(g). 2. Strike One: Fate v. Britt,…