From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairclough v. Southern Pacific Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 28, 1916
114 N.E. 1066 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued May 30, 1916

Decided December 28, 1916

Eli J. Blair for appellant.

Everett J. Esselstyn, J. Ard Haughwout and C.P. Williamson for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Robinson v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. ( 112 N.Y. 315.)

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN and HOGAN, JJ.; CHASE and CARDOZO, JJ., dissent on the ground that the amended Code section is retroactive.


Summaries of

Fairclough v. Southern Pacific Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 28, 1916
114 N.E. 1066 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Fairclough v. Southern Pacific Company

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA T. FAIRCLOUGH, Individually and as Executrix of WILLIAM H…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 28, 1916

Citations

114 N.E. 1066 (N.Y. 1916)
114 N.E. 1066

Citing Cases

Vandeweghe v. City of New York

All this is quite evident when we consider the rule that statutes must be presumed to be prospective only,…

Star-Kist Foods v. Chicago, Rock Island Pac.

It is well settled that the commencement of an action in a court which lacks jurisdiction will not toll the…