From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Ladd

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 3, 1947
85 Okla. Crim. 265 (Okla. Crim. App. 1947)

Opinion

No. A-10940.

December 3, 1947.

(Syllabus.)

1. Habeas Corpus — Insufficiency of Evidence to Reduce Appeal Bond. An application to reduce appeal bond will be denied where petition and evidence offered at hearing do not justify reduction.

2. Bail — Bond of $10,000 of Person Convicted of Manslaughter not Reduced Under Evidence Presented. The $10,000 appeal bond of person convicted of manslaughter in the first degree and sentenced to serve a term of 15 years in State Penitentiary, under facts here presented, will not be reduced.

Original habeas corpus proceeding by Boots Ladd for a reduction of his appeal bond. Application denied.

Kirksey M. Nix and George L. Hill, both of McAlester, for petitioner.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Fred W. Whetsel, Co. Atty., of McAlester, for respondent.


Boots Ladd filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this court, seeking reduction of his appeal bond.

Petitioner alleges that on July 9, 1947, he was convicted in the district court of Pittsburg county, Okla., in case No. 4773, of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree and sentenced to serve a term of 15 years in the State Penitentiary. He alleges that the district court of Pittsburg county set his appeal bond in said cause at the sum of Ten Thousand ($10,000) Dollars; that said bond is excessive, and prays that it be reduced.

A hearing was had in this court on said petition on September 17, 1947, and evidence received. The court, after due consideration, was of the opinion that the bond fixed by the district court of Pittsburg county is not excessive, and the application for reduction of the same was denied.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Ex parte Ladd

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 3, 1947
85 Okla. Crim. 265 (Okla. Crim. App. 1947)
Case details for

Ex parte Ladd

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte BOOTS LADD

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 3, 1947

Citations

85 Okla. Crim. 265 (Okla. Crim. App. 1947)
187 P.2d 265

Citing Cases

Martin v. Reinstein

Judicial notice as to matters of common knowledge is a broad concept in Arizona. See e.g., Miceli v.…