From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Edwards

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 13, 1919
80 So. 791 (Ala. 1919)

Opinion

6 Div. 878.

February 13, 1919.

Allen Bell and Burgin Jenkins, all of Birmingham, for appellant.


Amended rule 42, reproduced on page vii, 17 South., requires an application for certiorari to be accompanied by a brief "pointing out and arguing the point or decision sought to be revised and a certificate" to be attached to or embodied therein affirming that "a copy of said brief has been served on counsel" for the opposite party, if the adverse party was represented by counsel in the Court of Appeals. The petition for certiorari in the present instance is not accompanied by a brief in support thereof. Because of the failure to observe the stated rule, the petition for certiorari must be dismissed.

198 Ala. xiv.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Edwards

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 13, 1919
80 So. 791 (Ala. 1919)
Case details for

Ex Parte Edwards

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte EDWARDS. BIRMINGHAM WATERWORKS CO. v. EDWARDS

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Feb 13, 1919

Citations

80 So. 791 (Ala. 1919)
80 So. 791

Citing Cases

Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Tucker

H. M. Abercrombie and Edgar Allen, both of Birmingham, for appellee. Appellant had the benefit of the issue…

Krasner v. Reed

One of the prerequisites to invoking the jurisdiction of this court for such a review is that the application…