From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Bowers

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 30, 2001
36 S.W.3d 926 (Tex. App. 2001)

Summary

In Bowers, the reviewing court dismissed the appeal because nothing in the order or the record reflected that the trial court considered the merits of the writ application.

Summary of this case from Ex parte Garcia

Opinion

No. 05-00-01351-CR

Opinion issued January 30, 2001

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. MC2000-A5631

DISMISSED

John H. Carney, John H. Carney Associates, P.C., Dallas, for Appellant.

William T. (Bill) Hill, Jr., Karen R. Wise, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, for State.

Before Justices LAGARDE, FITZGERALD, and RICHTER.


OPINION


Nathan Bowers appeals the trial court's order denying his application for writ of habeas corpus. In two issues, appellant complains that the trial court erred by not granting his request for a hearing on the writ application and by not granting his writ on double jeopardy grounds. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

There is a distinction between the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus and the granting of relief on the claims set forth in an application for that writ. Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866, 869 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). An applicant cannot appeal from a trial court's refusal to issue or grant a writ of habeas corpus, but may appeal the denial of relief on the merits of the application. See Hargett, 819 S.W.2d at 868. Whether an order can be appealed is not determined by the form of the order alone; we may consider the entire record. See Nichlos v. State, 158 Tex.Crim. 367, 255 S.W.2d 522, 526 (1952) (op. on reh'g).

Here, appellant attempts to appeal the trial court's order denying his application for writ of habeas corpus. Neither the order — nor anything else in the record before us — reflects that the trial court considered the merits of appellant's petition. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Ex parte Miller, 931 S.W.2d 724, 725 (Tex.App.-Austin 1996, no pet.) (holding that the trial court's denial of Miller's application for writ of habeas corpus amounted to a refusal to issue the writ).


Summaries of

Ex Parte Bowers

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 30, 2001
36 S.W.3d 926 (Tex. App. 2001)

In Bowers, the reviewing court dismissed the appeal because nothing in the order or the record reflected that the trial court considered the merits of the writ application.

Summary of this case from Ex parte Garcia

dismissing appeal where "[n]either the order—nor anything else in the record before us—reflects that the trial court considered the merits of appellant's petition."

Summary of this case from Ex parte Gonzalez

explaining that when determining whether trial court denied relief on merits or simply refused to issue writ, appellate courts may consider entire record

Summary of this case from Ex parte Hall

In Bowers, the Court dismissed the appeal because nothing in the order reflected that the trial court considered the merits of the writ application.

Summary of this case from Ex parte Blakely
Case details for

Ex Parte Bowers

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE NATHAN BOWERS

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 30, 2001

Citations

36 S.W.3d 926 (Tex. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Ex parte Sanchez-Hernandez

We review the entire appellate record to make the determination of whether a court's denial is merit-based.…

Ex parte Gonzalez

In determining whether the trial court reached the merits, we review the entire record. Ex parte Bowers, 36…