From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Cheda

Supreme Court of California
Nov 8, 1921
187 Cal. 322 (Cal. 1921)

Opinion

S. F. No. 9998.

November 8, 1921.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal. Denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Henry E. Greer and Thos. P. Boyd for Appellant.

Jos. K. Hawkins for Respondent.


Motion to dismiss appeal from order on ground that the same is not an appealable order.

The order was one made by the superior court under section 1597 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing the executors to transfer and deliver to a third party certain assets of the estate, being certain shares of bank stock. The application for the order and the order were based on a contract for the sale thereof alleged to have been made by the deceased.

The claim that the order is nonappealable is based on the fact that such an order is not specified as an appealable order in the statute specifying the probate judgments and orders from which an appeal may be taken. (Code Civ. Proc., subd. 3, sec. 963) If the order here were exclusively a probate order there would be much force in the claim. [2] We are of opinion, however, that the proceeding authorized by section 1597 et seq. is in substance more than this, being practically a proceeding in equity terminating in a final judgment, having the full force and effect of a final judgment in an action for specific performance of a contract. As such we deem the order made therein a final judgment, appealable under subdivision 1 of section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

It was for this reason that the motion to dismiss the appeal was denied from the bench.

Angellotti, C. J., Wilbur J., Shaw, J., Sloane, J., Shurtleff, J., Lawlor, J., and Lennon, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Estate of Cheda

Supreme Court of California
Nov 8, 1921
187 Cal. 322 (Cal. 1921)
Case details for

Estate of Cheda

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of SILVIS H. CHEDA, Deceased, GEORGE A. CHEDA…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Nov 8, 1921

Citations

187 Cal. 322 (Cal. 1921)
202 P. 133

Citing Cases

In re Proceeding to Validate Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment Number Six of Sacramento

( Davis v. Judson, 159 Cal. 121 [ 113 P. 147]; McNeil v. Morgan, 157 Cal. 373 [ 108 P. 69].) In the Estate of…

Estate of Jacobson

The order that was made was in fact a judgment for the payment of money. ( Estate of Cheda, (1921) 187 Cal.…