From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Escobar v. Huertas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 27, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00169-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Dec. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00169-CMA-KLM

12-27-2011

JOSE MEDINA ESCOBAR, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN H. HUERTAS, LIEUTENANT TITEMAN, SERGEANT FRETWELL, SERGEANT WEST, C/O P. ARCHULETA, C/O SUTER, C/O J. ENGLEHART, and C/O D. JOHNSON, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's "Motion for Protection from Hostile Defendants, Right to Life" [Docket No. 54; Filed December 22, 2011] (the "Motion").

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Order and Recommendation issued November 4, 2011 [#41]. In his Motion, Plaintiff alleges wrongdoing by C/O Alanis, Lt. Travis, Sgt . Montgomery, and Sgt. Hudspeth. None of these individuals are named defendants in this lawsuit. As previously explained, the Court has limited authority to grant injunctive relief against nonparties, and the circumstances permitting such relief are not present here. [#41] at 4; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d) ("Every order granting an injunction ... binds only ... the parties ... ."); see also Little v. Jones, 607 F.3d 1245, 1251 (10th Cir. 2010) (affirming the denial of a motion for preliminary injunction on the basis that the incarcerated pro se plaintiff had not "alleged that the defendants named in the complaint participated in the alleged deprivations . . . .").


Summaries of

Escobar v. Huertas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 27, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00169-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Dec. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Escobar v. Huertas

Case Details

Full title:JOSE MEDINA ESCOBAR, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN H. HUERTAS, LIEUTENANT TITEMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 27, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00169-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Dec. 27, 2011)