Emmert Industrial Corporation v. Copeland Equipment Parts

Full title: EMMERT INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Aug 7, 2009

Civil No. 09-229-PK (D. Or. Aug. 7, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-229-PK.

August 7, 2009

ORDER

ANCER HAGGERTY, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Papak has issued a Findings and Recommendation [16] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction [6] and recommends denying all other motions as moot. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Campbell v. United States Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation in its entirety.

CONCLUSION

The Findings and Recommendation [16] is adopted. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [6] is GRANTED and all other pending motions are denied as moot. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.