ELEK v. SAFEWAY, INC.

Full title: JONATHAN ELEK, Plaintiff, v. SAFEWAY, INC., a foreign corporation…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Feb 25, 2009

Civil No. 07-6219-TC (D. Or. Feb. 25, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-6219-TC.

February 25, 2009

ORDER

MICHAEL HOGAN, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed Findings and Recommendation on January 15, 2009, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Plaintiff has timely filed objections. I have, therefore, givende novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings.

I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation filed January 15, 2009, in its entirety. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (#45) is allowed and this action is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.