From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E.H. Development v. Kelly Tractor

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 28, 1987
501 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 4-86-0985.

November 26, 1986. On motion for clarification January 28, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Walter N. Colbath, Jr., J.

Jose M. Sosa of Law Offices of Jose M. Sosa, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

William H. Benson of Benson, Stalions Moyle, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.


ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION


We hereby grant appellants' motion for rehearing and treat it as a motion for clarification.

Appellants have been unable to furnish this court with a transcript of the evidence presented at the final hearing or a reconstructed statement thereof pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3) which is essential to a proper appellate consideration of the final judgment. Accordingly, we are compelled to affirm the final judgment. Gardner v. Gardner, 501 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

E.H. Development v. Kelly Tractor

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 28, 1987
501 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

E.H. Development v. Kelly Tractor

Case Details

Full title:E.H. DEVELOPMENT, INC., EDILBERTO HERNANDEZ AND OLGA HERNANDEZ…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 28, 1987

Citations

501 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Jones v. First Federal Sav. and Loan

Accordingly, we have no alternative but to affirm the final judgment. Kolb v. Kolb, 502 So.2d 518, 519 (Fla.…

Chaiken v. Suchman

Next, the defendant argues that because there is no transcript of the hearing on the motion for attorney's…