From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Apr 9, 1998

707 So. 2d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

In Edwards, 707 So.2d at 969, the Fifth District issued a per curiam affirmance that cited Maddox as controlling authority.

Summary of this case from Maddox v. State

No. 97-0478

Opinion filed April 9, 1998 JANUARY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, Hale R. Stancil, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Maddox v. State, No. 96-3590 (Fla. 5th DCA March 13, 1998).

GRIFFIN, C.J., GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.