Argued June 6, 1872
Decided November 12, 1872
H.E. Knox for the appellants.
Charles F. Sanford for the respondent.
CHURCH, Ch. J., reads opinion for reversal. ALLEN, GROVER and RAPALLO, JJ., concur; PECKHAM J., not sitting. FOLGER and ANDREWS, JJ., did not hear argument.
Order reversed and judgment below affirmed, with costs.
Full title:WILLIAM S. EDSALL et al., Appellants, v . THE CAMDEN AND AMBOY RAILROAD…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 12, 1872
It is easy to see that the resolution as framed is ambiguous in its terms and may be construed as providing…
Rosenstein v. VogemannThe rule is that an affreightment contract, modifying or qualifying the carrier's common-law liability, must…