From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eagle-Picher Indus. Inc. v. Proverb

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 6, 1985
464 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-1724.

March 6, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Rupert Jasen Smith, J.

Michael K. McLemore of Kimbrell, Hamann, Jennings, Womack, Carlson Kniskern, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

John F. Venable of Venable, Venable Venable, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's non-final order denying appellant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Section 48.081, Florida Statutes (1983) makes no requirement of connexity between the cause of action being sued upon and the defendant foreign corporation's Florida business activities, if the defendant has a business office within the state and is actually engaged in business therefrom, and process is served upon a resident business agent of the defendant. This statute does not violate territorial jurisdiction limitations imposed by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. See Hoffman v. Air India, 393 F.2d 507 (5th Cir. 1968); Dombroff v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., 450 So.2d 923 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), and cases cited therein.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Eagle-Picher Indus. Inc. v. Proverb

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 6, 1985
464 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Eagle-Picher Indus. Inc. v. Proverb

Case Details

Full title:EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLANT, v. SHIRLEY PROVERB, AS PERSONAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 6, 1985

Citations

464 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

White v. Pepsico, Inc.

"Connexity" is the term courts have adopted to mean a link between a cause of action and the activities of a…

Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Cherry

It is well settled that a foreign corporation which voluntarily registers and qualifies to do business in…