From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eagle Paper International, Inc. v. Expolink, Ltd.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division
Jan 17, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:07cv160 (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:07cv160.

January 17, 2008


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants' Motion To Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b) 6 and 12(b) 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation on October 12, 2007, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. On November 26, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed his report recommending that Defendants' Motion To Dismiss be GRANTED. By copy of the report, the parties were advised of their right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. The Court has received no objections to the report and the time for filing same has expired. After careful review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court does hereby accept the findings and recommendations set forth in the report of the United States Magistrate Judge filed November 26, 2007. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion To Dismiss for a lack of personal jurisdiction is GRANTED and Defendants' motion to dismiss for a failure to state a claim is DENIED.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Final Order to counsel of record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eagle Paper International, Inc. v. Expolink, Ltd.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division
Jan 17, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:07cv160 (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Eagle Paper International, Inc. v. Expolink, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:EAGLE PAPER INTERNATIONAL, INC. Plaintiff, v. EXPOLINK, LTD. et al…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division

Date published: Jan 17, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:07cv160 (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Jackson

Rule 44.1's requirement of notice is designed simply to provide courts and litigants “adequate notice of the…

Microaire Surgical Instruments v. Arthrex

"A defendant invoking forum non conveniens ordinarily bears a heavy burden in opposing the plaintiff's chosen…