From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E & A Development, Inc. v. Paragon Builders of Connecticut, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 9, 1999
738 A.2d 655 (Conn. 1999)

Opinion

Lawrence P. Weisman, in support of the petition.

Decided September 9, 1999


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 355 (AC 18226), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's claim is moot because the funds had already been distributed in accordance with the trial court's order discharging the mechanic's lien?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that because the trial court properly discharged the mechanic's lien, there was no need for the funds to have been held as security?

"3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's claim is moot because we can no longer grant any practical relief?

"4. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the decision of the trial court discharging the mechanic's lien without imposing the seven day stay mandated by General Statutes § 49-35c (b) was correct?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16184.


Summaries of

E & A Development, Inc. v. Paragon Builders of Connecticut, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 9, 1999
738 A.2d 655 (Conn. 1999)
Case details for

E & A Development, Inc. v. Paragon Builders of Connecticut, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:E A DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. PARAGON BUILDERS OF CONNECTICUT, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 9, 1999

Citations

738 A.2d 655 (Conn. 1999)
738 A.2d 655

Citing Cases

E & A Development, Inc. v. Paragon Builders of Connecticut, Inc.

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court; E A…