From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durbin v. Hartford Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 11, 2016
647 F. App'x 825 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-56450

04-11-2016

DOROTHY DURBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00052-BEN-MDD MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 7, 2016 Pasadena, California Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Plaintiff Dorothy Durbin appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Hartford Life Insurance Company ("Hartford"). On de novo review, Baccei v. United States, 632 F.3d 1140, 1144 (9th Cir. 2011), we affirm.

1. Even if Plaintiff's financial abuse claim were not time-barred, an issue that we need not decide, there is no evidence that Hartford "retain[ed]" Plaintiff's property. See Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.30(a)(1) ("'Financial abuse' of an elder . . . occurs when a person or entity . . . retains real or personal property of an elder . . . for a wrongful use . . . ."). Pacific Standard Life Insurance Company and Hartford issued the loans in 1990, 1992, and 1997. Although those acts may have violated the contract, in none of these instances did Hartford (or its predecessor) keep the funds.

2. Plaintiff cannot show that Hartford, in 2011, had a legal duty to repay the loans and, therefore, that it retained property for a "wrongful use." Id. Not every financial taking or withholding constitutes financial abuse of an elder, especially when the elder has no legal right to the property. See Stebley v. Litton Loan Servicing, LLP, 134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 604, 608 (Ct. App. 2011) (noting that it is not "wrongful use" for "a commercial lender to . . . take collateral, or to foreclose on collateral when a debt is not paid" (internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Durbin v. Hartford Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 11, 2016
647 F. App'x 825 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Durbin v. Hartford Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY DURBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 11, 2016

Citations

647 F. App'x 825 (9th Cir. 2016)