From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dupas v. Arnone

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Aug 20, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-1215 (AVC) (D. Conn. Aug. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-1215 (AVC)

08-20-2013

DEANERIC DUPAS, Plaintiff, v. LEO ARNONE, et al., Defendants.


RULING AND ORDER

The plaintiff asks the court to order Counselor Bonaventura to make as many copies as the plaintiff wants without charge. The plaintiff's motion is denied for two reasons.

First, Counselor Bonaventura is not a party to this case. Thus, the court cannot order Counselor Bonaventura to take any action. See United States v. Regan, 858 F.2d 115, 120 (2d Cir. 1988) (noting that courts cannot issue orders to non-parties). Second, the exhibits attached to the motion show that, even when the plaintiff did not meet the indigency requirement entitling him to copies, Counselor Bonaventura was providing the plaintiff two copies of documents he seeks to file with the court. The plaintiff would file the original document with the court, retain one copy for his records and serve one copy on defendants' counsel. More copies are not required.

The plaintiff's motion for order compelling Counselor Bonaventura to make copies [Doc. #40] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut this 20th day of August 2013.

_____________

Thomas P. Smith

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Dupas v. Arnone

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Aug 20, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-1215 (AVC) (D. Conn. Aug. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Dupas v. Arnone

Case Details

Full title:DEANERIC DUPAS, Plaintiff, v. LEO ARNONE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Date published: Aug 20, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-1215 (AVC) (D. Conn. Aug. 20, 2013)