From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dumas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 17, 1995
651 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-1686.

January 20, 1995. Order Amending on Grant of State's Motion for Rehearing March 17, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County; John W. Watson, III, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Sean K. Ahmed, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a sentence. Because it was a departure from the sentencing guidelines and no reason was given for the departure, we vacate the sentence. State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 1994). The requirement to pay money to "First Step" is error. Fyler v. State, 645 So.2d 108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); McLeod v. State, 645 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Sweet v. State, 644 So.2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Mittner v. State, 648 So.2d 139 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Murray v. State, 647 So.2d 313 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Avallone v. State, 646 So.2d 745 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Watson v. State, 641 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Macon v. State, 639 So.2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Eckenrode v. State, 638 So.2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Botts v. State, 634 So.2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The requirement that, while on probation, he "work diligently at a lawful occupation" is error. Armstrong v. State, 620 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING


We grant the state's motion for rehearing and amend the last sentence of our opinion issued on January 20, 1995 to read as follows: The requirement that, while on probation, he "work diligently at a lawful occupation" is not error. Armstrong v. State, 620 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

REHEARING GRANTED; OPINION AMENDED.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., dissents without opinion.


Summaries of

Dumas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 17, 1995
651 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Dumas v. State

Case Details

Full title:PETER DUMAS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 17, 1995

Citations

651 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)