From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar, Inc. v. 26 Adar N.B. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 1, 2006
32 A.D.3d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-03988.

August 1, 2006.

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of a claim to real property, the defendants 26 Adar N.B. Corp. and Nachman Brach appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schack, J.), dated April 19, 2005, which denied their motion to place the action on the trial calendar or, in the alternative, to transfer the action to Justice Theodore T. Jones, and thereupon vacated the note of issue and certificate of readiness.

Noel W. Hauser, New York, N.Y., for appellants.

Tenenbaum Berger, LLP, Brooklyn, N.Y. (David M. Berger of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ.


Ordered that so much of the order as vacated the note of issue and certificate of readiness is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the remainder of the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiffs. The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in vacating the note of issue and certificate of readiness to permit further discovery.

The remaining portions of the order appealed from do not affect a substantial right and are not otherwise appealable as of right, and leave to appeal has not been granted ( see CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; [c]; Matter of Coastal Oil N.Y. v Newton, 231 AD2d 55, 57).


Summaries of

Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar, Inc. v. 26 Adar N.B. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 1, 2006
32 A.D.3d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar, Inc. v. 26 Adar N.B. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CONGREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR, INC. et al., Respondents, v. 26 ADAR N.B…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 1, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6062
818 N.Y.S.2d 778

Citing Cases

Torres v. Saint Vincents Catholic Medical Centers

To satisfy the requirement of "good cause," the party seeking vacatur must "demonstrate that unusual or…

CONGREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR v. NACHMAN BRACH INC.

Two days later, BRACH and Mr. Hauser appealed my decision and order and still failed to complete discovery as…