From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drazen v. Pinto

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Mar 13, 2023
61 F.4th 1297 (11th Cir. 2023)

Opinion

No. 21-10199

03-13-2023

Susan DRAZEN, on behalf of herself and other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, GoDaddy.com, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendant-Appellee, v. Mr. Juan Enrique PINTO, Movant-Appellant.

John R. Cox, John R. Cox, PLLC, Spanish Fort, AL, Robert M. Hatch, David Max Oppenheim, Bock Hatch & Oppenheim, LLC, Chicago, IL, Evan Meyers, Yevgeniy Y. Turin, McGuire Law, PC, Chicago, IL, Kenneth J. Riemer, Underwood & Riemer, Mobile, AL, Earl Price Underwood, Jr., Underwood & Riemer, PC, Fairhope, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Robert William Clore, Jason Eric Pepe, Jason Eric Pepe, Bandas Law Firm, PC, Corpus Christi, TX, Thomas Jefferson Deen, III, T. Jefferson Deen, III, Mobile, AL, for Movant-Appellant. Matthew Brian Criscuolo, Cozen O'Connor, West Palm Beach, FL, Paula Zecchini, GoDaddy.com, LLC, Kirkland, WA, Jeffrey M. Monhait, Cozen O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant-Appellee.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-00563-KD-B John R. Cox, John R. Cox, PLLC, Spanish Fort, AL, Robert M. Hatch, David Max Oppenheim, Bock Hatch & Oppenheim, LLC, Chicago, IL, Evan Meyers, Yevgeniy Y. Turin, McGuire Law, PC, Chicago, IL, Kenneth J. Riemer, Underwood & Riemer, Mobile, AL, Earl Price Underwood, Jr., Underwood & Riemer, PC, Fairhope, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Robert William Clore, Jason Eric Pepe, Jason Eric Pepe, Bandas Law Firm, PC, Corpus Christi, TX, Thomas Jefferson Deen, III, T. Jefferson Deen, III, Mobile, AL, for Movant-Appellant. Matthew Brian Criscuolo, Cozen O'Connor, West Palm Beach, FL, Paula Zecchini, GoDaddy.com, LLC, Kirkland, WA, Jeffrey M. Monhait, Cozen O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant-Appellee. Before William Pryor, Chief Judge, Wilson, Jordan, Rosenbaum, Jill Pryor, Newsom, Branch, Grant, Luck, Lagoa, and Brasher, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this appeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal will be reheard en banc. The panel's opinion is VACATED.


Summaries of

Drazen v. Pinto

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Mar 13, 2023
61 F.4th 1297 (11th Cir. 2023)
Case details for

Drazen v. Pinto

Case Details

Full title:Susan DRAZEN, on behalf of herself and other persons similarly situated…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Mar 13, 2023

Citations

61 F.4th 1297 (11th Cir. 2023)

Citing Cases

Zononi v. CHW Grp.

Thereafter, on March 27, 2023, the District Court stayed this case due to the pendency of a case before the…

Orenstein v. Spruce Servs.

. On March 17, 2023, the parties filed a Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Report suggesting that “a stay…