From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 10, 2003
870 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 2D00-1076.

Opinion filed October 10, 2003.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Michael Hunter, Judge.


ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA


This case is before the court on remand from the Supreme Court of Florida, which vacated this court's opinion and remanded for reconsideration in light of Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla. 2002).See Downs v. State, 28 Fla. L. Weekly S657 (Fla. Aug. 21, 2003). We accordingly remand this cause to the trial court to reconsider Downs' motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) on its merits in light of Burgess, 831 So.2d 137. See generally Adams v. State, 755 So.2d 678, 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (holding that movant may assert a Hale claim in a rule 3.800(a) motion if the facts supporting the claim are apparent from the face of the record); Valdes v. State, 765 So.2d 774, 777 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (concluding that the appellant was entitled to relief because his Hale claim was apparent from the face of the record).

Downs was adjudicated guilty after a jury trial, and the transcript of the trial is part of the record.

Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993).

Reversed and remanded.

WHATLEY, DAVIS, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Downs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 10, 2003
870 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Downs v. State

Case Details

Full title:ELLIS D. DOWNS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 10, 2003

Citations

870 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Good v. State

Good's motion is facially sufficient. See Downs v. State, 870 So.2d 46 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). However, the…