From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 10, 1993
627 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 93-00183.

November 10, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Diana M. Allen, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and D.P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dell H. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's convictions and the order placing him on probation following his plea of nolo contendere. We strike that portion of the judgment which requires payments to the "Court Improvement Fund" and "Hillsborough County Drug Fund," without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition of these non-statutory costs after proper notice to appellant. See, e.g., Alfonso v. State, 595 So.2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

FRANK, C.J., and DANAHY and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Douglas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 10, 1993
627 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Douglas v. State

Case Details

Full title:GUY LEE DOUGLAS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 10, 1993

Citations

627 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Reyes v. State

Accordingly, we strike this assessment and prohibit its reassessment on remand. Aultman v. State, 515 So.2d…