From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doody v. Schriro

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 12, 2009
566 F.3d 839 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 06-17161.

May 12, 2009.

Kim Christensen Clark, Esquire, Steptoe Johnson, LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Nathan Z. Dershowitz, Esquire, Victoria B. Eiger, Esquire, Dershowitz Eiger Adelson, PC, New York, NY, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Joseph Thomas Maziarz, Jon Anderson, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Diane M. Ramsey, Esquire, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondents-Appellees.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges HAWKINS and SILVERMAN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

Doody v. Schriro

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 12, 2009
566 F.3d 839 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Doody v. Schriro

Case Details

Full title:Johnathan Andrew, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora B. SCHRIRO; Megan Savage…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 12, 2009

Citations

566 F.3d 839 (9th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Doody v. Ryan

Appellee Dora Schriro filed a petition for rehearing en banc, which we granted. Doody v. Schriro, 566 F.3d…

Doody v. Schriro

Appellee Dora Schriro filed a petition for rehearing en banc, which we granted. See Doody v. Schriro, 566…