From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doherty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 5, 1994
640 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2924.

August 5, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Alice Blackwell White, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and M.A. Lucas, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The appellant, Edward Doherty, was convicted of carrying a concealed firearm pursuant to section 790.01, Florida Statutes (1993). He appeals the denial of his motion to suppress the firearm found in his vehicle after he consented to the search. Because the legal basis for his argument on appeal is entirely different from the argument he propounded to the trial court, the error was not preserved for review. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32 (Fla. 1985) (in order to adequately preserve an alleged error for appellate review, the legal basis for the argument at the trial court level must be generally the same as the legal basis for the claim of error at the appellate level).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Doherty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 5, 1994
640 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Doherty v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD F. DOHERTY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 5, 1994

Citations

640 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Ferreira v. State

Procedurally, this issue was not preserved for appeal because the appellant did not object at trial based on…