From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Mann

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Oct 26, 2006
Case No. 6:05-cv-259-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Oct. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 6:05-cv-259-Orl-31DAB.

October 26, 2006


ORDER


This cause comes before the Court on Defendant City of Orlando's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 63) filed July 12, 2006.

On October 5, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 80) recommending that the motion be denied. No objections have been filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order.

2. The Defendant City of Orlando's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Doe v. Mann

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Oct 26, 2006
Case No. 6:05-cv-259-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Oct. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Doe v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. EDWIN R. MANN, CITY OF ORLANDO, and JOHN SMITH…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Oct 26, 2006

Citations

Case No. 6:05-cv-259-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Oct. 26, 2006)

Citing Cases

Taser Int'l v. Phazzer Elecs.

“Federal district courts have applied a fairly restrictive standard in ruling on motions for judgment on the…

JERMC LTD v. Town of Redington Shores

However, there is not necessarily a sovereign immunity bar to stating a claim against a governmental entity…