From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DODD v. BARNES

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester Division
Jul 5, 1967
279 F. Supp. 290 (E.D. Tenn. 1967)

Opinion

Civ. No. 819.

July 5, 1967.

Harry W. Camp, McMinnville, Tenn., for plaintiffs.

Paul E. Jennings, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, Tenn., for defendant McCanless.

Edwin F. Hunt, Nashville, Tenn., for balance of defendants.

Before PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and WILSON and NEESE, District Judges.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


A three-judge Court having been constituted herein under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 2281; and it now appearing to such Court that the private act of the General Assembly of Tennessee under which the defendants are sought to be enjoined herein is one of limited application, concerning only Warren County, Tennessee and no other county or other local jurisdiction of the state of Tennessee, and that 28 U.S.C. § 2281 authorizes a three-judge court only when a state statute of general and statewide application is sought to be enjoined, Moody v. Flowers (1967), 387 U.S. 97, 87 S.Ct. 1544, 18 L.Ed.2d 643; and, it therefore appearing to such Court that the three-judge Court herein was improperly constituted and should be dissolved forthwith: it hereby is

Ordered that the three-judge Court herein is dissolved, and this action is transferred to the District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Winchester Division, for further proceedings.


Summaries of

DODD v. BARNES

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester Division
Jul 5, 1967
279 F. Supp. 290 (E.D. Tenn. 1967)
Case details for

DODD v. BARNES

Case Details

Full title:Russell DODD et al., Plaintiffs, v. L. H. BARNES et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester Division

Date published: Jul 5, 1967

Citations

279 F. Supp. 290 (E.D. Tenn. 1967)
279 F. Supp. 290

Citing Cases

Harris v. Bailey

These claims are predicated upon the continuation of this case as a class action. Because the class action is…