From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'LA ROSA v. RODRIGUEZ

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 18, 1984
460 So. 2d 567 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-618.

December 18, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Stuart M. Simons, Judge.

Stone, Sostchin Gonzalez and Robert Rossano, Miami, for appellants.

Goodhart, Rosner Green; Daniels Hicks and Elizabeth K. Clarke, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.


Upon consideration of the record and briefs of counsel we are convinced that the trial court did not err in entering judgment pursuant to a jury verdict which appellants contend included inconsistent findings. We find no merit in this contention. The record demonstrates that the answers provided by the jury on the special interrogatory verdict are all that are necessary to properly determine liability and damages as between the parties. No reversible error having been demonstrated, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

D'LA ROSA v. RODRIGUEZ

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 18, 1984
460 So. 2d 567 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

D'LA ROSA v. RODRIGUEZ

Case Details

Full title:ALDO D'LA ROSA AND MIRTHA MARCEIRA MAZZA, APPELLANTS, v. BARBARO RODRIGUEZ…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 18, 1984

Citations

460 So. 2d 567 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Triana v. Fi-Shock, Inc.

The decision on whether to give a particular jury instruction, or include a special interrogatory on a…